× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Assuming I am understanding you, a CALL is not a procedure call, it is a
program call.

Making a procedure call is thousands of times faster than making a program
call whether that procedure is in a program or in a service program.

Program calls have gotten faster but they are still very slow compared to
procedure call.


On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:13 PM, RPGLIST <rpglist@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I was recently reading that a static procedure call is faster than a
typical program CALL.

I know that with procedures you can pass more data (Parms if you will)
than you can with a typcial program CALL, but are locally or externally
defined procedures really that faster than program CALLS?



--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.