× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Check SQLCOD or SQLSTT after every SQL statement, except DECLARE CURSOR, because it is not an executable statement.

If you look in the job log you should find the statement that failed before you get the cursor not open error.

Sam


On 10/25/2012 2:42 PM, Jerry C. Adams wrote:
First: V5R1



I have a simple (I thought) SQLRPGLE program that is supposed to select all
of the records from our Item Master, put them in order, and then use the
retrieved records to print a report. Done this a few dozen times in the
past, but this time no dice. Under debug the program ends (normally, not an
abend) when I test the value of SQLSTT, which is 24501 (Cursor is not open).



Relevant, I think, code:



<code>

$BuildSQL();



/end-free



C/Exec SQL

C+ Prepare MySQLStmt from :SQLString

C/End-Exec

C/Exec SQL

C+ Declare NVList Cursor for MySQLStmt

C/End-Exec

C/Exec SQL

C+ Open NVList

C/End-Exec



/free



DOW 1 = 1;



/end-free



C/Exec SQL

C+ Fetch Next from NVList into :NVLine

C/End-Exec



/free



IF SQLStt = '02000' OR SQLCOD < *Zeros;

</endcode>



The $BuildSQL subprocedure successfully builds the SQLString value:

SELECT imloc, imdesc, imumi, imbal, impidx, impitm, imclas,

FROM "A.IVMAST" ORDER BY imloc, impitm FOR Read Only



NVLine is a data structure with the field names equivalent to the SELECT
with the proper attributes and order.



SQLSST = '24501' and SQLCOD = -501 under debug. Both of which mean that the
sursor is not open.



This is a single mod program; the only subprocedure is $BuildSQL which only
creates the SQLString. The code snippet is from a subroutine. So I don't
see that the cursor could be closed by ending the activation group, which
was the compile option.



I have compared this to similar programs I wrote using the same methodology.
I, also, know/suspect that I am overlooking the obvious and will be
embarrassed when we find out what is wrong, but I have looked at this and
debugged it for the last hour.



Thanks.



Jerry C. Adams

IBM i Programmer/Analyst

Never argue with a women when she's tired -- or rested.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.