|
Our shop is going to be moving from V5R4 to V7 in a few months so I cancould
finally start using the enhancements in V6 and V7.
The idea of being able to define the files in Sub-Procedures instead of
globally in a module I was thinking would be very cool. Then I got to
thinking when would I really need to do that? When has everyone else been
finding it was a better idea to define the files in a sub-procedure?
I was reading about how the file will be closed without it having the
static keyword. When would it be better to use the static versus not? If
your using the sub-procedure repeatedly the open and closing of the file
seems like a reason to be using the static. Interesting idea that you
be getting different records for the same file in differentsub-procedures.
list
Thanks
Andy
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx--
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.