×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 01 May 2012 12:17, Jerry C. Adams wrote:
I was restoring my test environment's data library. Issued a CLRLIB
on it first. That's when I got the error (forget the CPF #): Not all
objects could be removed/deleted. At least, I *think* that's what I
was doing at the time; the little gray cells are pushing out and
coloring the hair leaving very little behind.
CLRLIB should not be affected by the pseudo-closed cursor; at least
not by v5r3. I just verified for a pseudo-closed cursor in both
*DFTACTGRP and a named activation group.
I would suspect a restore over the open file would be more likely to
have been affected; i.e. perhaps there was an error only when CLRLIB was
not done prior to the restore.? IIRC the database restore feature was
not one of the earliest to change to support the close-before-action
enhancement; the lack causes the code to suffer the normal open
restrictions, because of course, the file is not closed in a preemptive
request. The database file delete would have been one of the first to
have that enhancement, and that is what implements the delete effect of
database *FILE objects for CLRLIB; available since way back in the day.
Plus, I'm just a neat freak. I don't like leaving a mess behind; when
the programs are through, I want all of the trash taken out (closed).
Of course, looking at my desk one would not surmise that.
FWiW, best to change that perception with regard to "open files" that
are merely pseudo-closed for the SQL, to avoid impacting the attempts by
SQL to improve its performance. That is, rather than trying to force
the programs that might effect pseudo-closes to stop doing that, for the
sake of neatness, allow that effect in\of the programs, and only remove
the open files when feeling the need *outside* of the programs; e.g. by
RCLACTGRP. Reclaim of the activation group would of course, for the
sake of neatness, also need to be done ;-)
Regards, Chuck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.