×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 2012/4/20 11:01 AM, Klugman, Luke wrote:
I am using the following xml-into opcode to parse some xml the new
countprefix option.
However, when I do not have any elements for my specific count instead
of the count being zero, it is being set to 16448. I have defined all my
count fields as 5i 0.
I am also using allowmissing=yes if this is effecting the results.
I agree with Jon that the problem is most likely that you didn't name
your countprefix subfields according to the way your specified the
countprefix option, or that you put the countprefix subfields at a
different level from the counted subfields.
If you could post your XML-INTO statement and options, and the data
structure, then we can see whether you have got your subfields named
correctly and coded your countprefix option correctly.
You can post the DS and XML-INTO statement code at
http://code.midrange.com and then in your forum post you can just post
the URL that it gives you.
(I also agree with Jon that you probably don't need allowmissing=yes if
you have countprefix.)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
