× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2012

Re: SQL limited access to QS36F - how strong, how weak is the access ?

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:39 PM, CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However the data from each
format of the MFPF might best sometimes or might effectively be
required, to move into separate physical files, each with their own
specific external [Record Format definition] descriptions.

That's what I was thinking, a new PF for each format, then a MFLF over
all the new physicals...

Given a
capability for the logical file [DDS or SQL] to /direct map/ the data in
the underlying physical buffer, irrespective of the PF fields, plus
those logical files being able to retain all I\O capabilities beyond
read-only, then a direct transition from the MFPF to an equivalent MFLF
would be much easier; alas, no can do.
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/201203/msg00161.html

I didn't follow any of that. :)

It's been a long time since I bothered with MFLF...

Charles

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.