×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 2/14/2012 2:47 PM, Henrik Rützou wrote:
This is more likely a data structure behavior problem because a unicode
fields starts it's "life" with complete different values based on whether
they
are defined as a free field or in a data structure.
I think the whole problem has been that the data structure started out
with the standard RPG value for an uninitialized data structure, and
never got changed from that. It is standard RPG behaviour to initialize
a data structure with no INZ to x'40's, no matter what type of subfields
there are.
Sean has already said that there are two versions of the data structure
in the /copy file, and that the one without INZ was being used.
Sean had intended to have the data structure initialized, and was
operating on the assumption that it was initialized. If it had actually
been initialized as intendend, I'm sure that there wouldn't have been
this apparent problem with XML-INTO.
But maybe it's good that it didn't, because on the systeminetwork
version of this thread, I was able to tell Sean about how using the
countprefix option is a much better way of handling missing XML data
than the allowmissing option.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
