|
On Feb 1, 2012, at 3:26 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I see this as a fully useful methodology, and a
way to extend the life and use of the language. Others don't agree with
me, so we'll have to agree to disagree.
I'm 100% with Vern here. When the RPG Queen Barbara Morris tell me that in
her own programming she uses her IFS OA handler rather than mess around
with the IFS APIs every time, then I know there is more utility in OA than
you are giving it credit for.
Sadly a lot of the people who could be providing really great handlers
that would benefit many "ordinary" RPGers seem to have this perspective. I
confess to having been in that camp myself some years ago. I now firmly
believe that we won't move the masses forward unless we make the initial
steps easier.
If they were going to accept the Marie Antoinette "Let them use APIs"
doctrine then I'd love to hear why they haven't done so in their thousands.
The fact that they haven't points to the obvious - we needed another
approach. OA gives us that opportunity.
Jon Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.