×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
hi John,
On 12/6/2011 6:04 PM, jmmckee flinthills.com wrote:
I have the ancient v4r2 documentation files on my pc. The way I read
it, delete with factor 1 searched for and deleted the record. That
record might, or might not be the same record currently in the buffer.
You're absolutely right. Not sure why SJL thinks that including factor1
on a delete wouldn't make any difference?
But including Factor1 on the delete opcode does require it to release
it's current record lock, search for the first record matching the given
key, lock it, and then delete it.
Thus, if you were using a "UNIQUE" key, it'd be very close to being the
same (but not quite the same, because it has to release and re-get the lock)
But, on a non-unique key they are VERY different. So, I'm completely
with you... you should not have specified a key there.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
