× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



To avoid "move" you can define the input file twice (with different names, you can "create alias") and then read input, chain output, chain input alias, update output.

It is a lot clearer if you use rpg free. The input file can also be "primary", then you dont need the read.

Gary Choi wrote:

Hi,

I have a simply RPG with one Input file A, one output file B and they have same fields names KEY, FIELD1, FIELD2

Here is the code:

*LOVAL SETLL A
1 DOWEQ 1
READ A 99
99 LEAVE

WRITE B


ENDDO

Without any MOVE (no rename of file B FIELD1 & FIELD2) it can write to file B

However, for update operation


*LOVAL SETLL A
1 DOWEQ 1
READ A 99
99 LEAVE

(MOVE FIELD1#TMP)

KEY CHAIN B 98
(MOVE #TMP FIELD1)

N98 UPDATE B


ENDDO

Without any MOVE in (...), can reading every records in file A update FIELD1 & FIELD2 in file B of the matching key of file B?
Further, if I add MOVE FIELD1 #TMP before CHAIN, and N98 MOVE #TMP FIELD1 after CHIAN, can it only update FIELD1 in file B with value of FIELD1 in file A? and FIELD2 is unchanged in file B?


Thanks

CHOI



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.