Re: Embedded SQL - performance question -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Heh. Which comment? The one on performance or the one about rousing the rabble?

Joe

Joe, I thought you disproved that comment years ago?

--
Mike Wills
http://mikewills.me

Sent from my mobile

On Jun 1, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Pete Hall<pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2011-05-31 20:40, Joe Pluta wrote:

On 5/31/2011 5:04 PM, Pete Hall wrote:

My experience has been that if an appropriate index exists, performance
knocks your socks off. If not, well, it doesn't. SQL does not like
legacy indexes with include/exclude definitions either, so those won't
do you any good. Index advisor is your friend...

CHAIN outperforms FETCH with index.

Joe

Joe, you rabble rouser...

--
Pete Hall
pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.