|
On 2011-05-31 20:40, Joe Pluta wrote:
On 5/31/2011 5:04 PM, Pete Hall wrote:
My experience has been that if an appropriate index exists, performance
knocks your socks off. If not, well, it doesn't. SQL does not like
legacy indexes with include/exclude definitions either, so those won't
do you any good. Index advisor is your friend...
CHAIN outperforms FETCH with index.
Joe
Joe, you rabble rouser...
--
Pete Hall
pete@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
