×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I was not referring to your statement below, but to Value Options(*String) more efficient as just Value.
Bruce... thanks for your vote... now we're with two already considering it a bug :-)
Kind regards,
Paul
________________________________
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Dennis [iseries@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 13:51
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: RE: Varying(4) bug ?
I did not mean to suggest that VARYING VALUE OTIONS(*STRING) is more efficient than CONST. Let me explain.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
