× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Not a big fan of using D spec to create compile time array. Mainly because
of fix lenght on D spec. CTDATA seems much cleaner.

Unless D spec goes free form, instead of creating a new InzArray D spec
keyword, I would rather see RPG allowing us assigning multiple values to
multiple elements in one eval statement:

arr[] = ('*PGM':'*SRVPGM':'*CMD':'*FILE');


"Barbara Morris" <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.37138.1301747060.2702.rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx...
On 4/1/2011 5:19 PM, Alan Campin wrote:

Would be nice if IBM would just give use an INZARRAY keyword.

InzArray('*PGM':'*SRVPGM':'*CMD':'*FILE')

On 4/1/2011 6:29 PM, Scott Klement wrote:

Ick.


Why ick? I don't think a new keyword is needed; INZ could do fine, just
with a new rule that allows multiple values for arrays.

It wouldn't be great for longer values, but that's true of all INZ values.

D arr s 100a dim(2)
D inz(
D 'I must go down to the +
D sea again, +
D to the lonely sea +
D and the sky,' :
D 'And all I ask is a tall +
D ship and a star +
D to steer her by,')





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.