Re: SetLL *start -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

I agree that using a format with, say, open, makes little sense.

But, it would be nice to be able to use all the opcodes with the file if there is only one format in the file. Put another way, the sell by date of formats has passed.

Sam

On 2/28/2011 6:00 PM, Barbara Morris wrote:

On 2/27/2011 5:08 PM, M. Lazarus wrote:

Is there any good technical (not historical) reason that we still have
any opcodes that can't use record formats and file names, for data
files, interchangeably? PF's can't contain multiple formats.
Multi-format LF's are relatively rare nowadays. The only time it would
require differentiation is if a MFLF is used.

Is there a consideration to relax that requirement?

Not sure what would qualify as a good technical reason.

I don't think it would be good to simply say that a file name is
synonymous with its record format name if there is only one format. At
least, it doesn't make sense to me to allow say using a format name on
an OPEN opcode. But maybe it makes sense to allow a WRITE or SETLL
*START/*END to a format name if there is only one format.

There hasn't been any real consideration given to relaxing those rules.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.