× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi everyone
I never even contemplated displaying 132 characters
Is it just a case of changing the DSPSIZE?
If it is and there are multiple screen within the DDS, that are NOT subfile screen, how do they look?
How does the data display in respect to readability?
Do the users complain that they need a magnifying glass to read the screen?
Must try this when I get time (ha ha ha ha .......)

Alan Shore
Programmer/Analyst, Direct Response
E:AShore@xxxxxxxx
P:(631) 200-5019
C:(631) 880-8640
"If you're going through Hell, keep going" - Winston Churchill



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles Wilt
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 8:07 AM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: Subfile "move to top" function (132-col screen)

We I first got to my present employee...every screen was 80 columns...

I had a project a couple-three years ago, which originally spec'ed out a report that the user would mark up, along with by a data entry screen...

I asked why not beef up the screen with more info, so that the user can see everything they need to make their decision...which cried out for 132 columns.

It was a pretty decent fight between me and the BA to do the screen as
132 columns....I won eventually.

What funny is that now, just about every screen we're asked to create and/or modify is requested to be 132 columns.

Charles

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Luke Gerhardt <lgerhardt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Glad to know I'm not the only person that thinks that a 132 screen
comes in handy on occasion.  I get screamed at (literally) every time
I use one because "132 is for printer files only and must never be
used on our system!"  Then why is in SDA...?  Is IBM just *trying* to
get me in trouble?  ;)

On 2/16/2011 4:34 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
If real estate is an issue, have you considered a 132-column screen
instead of 80-column?
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.