Re: Memory allocation strategy -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Memory allocation strategy
From: Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 18:04:30 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Jan 8, 2011, at 1:00 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

There's a gotcha though. If the allocated storage contains pointers, they may no longer be valid after running realloc

Have you had experience of this happening Pete? I was under the impression that the move of the storage was done pointer-safe to avoid this possibility.

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Memory allocation strategy , Rory Hewitt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.