|
On 07/13/2010 06:43 PM, Barbara Morris wrote:
> M. Lazarus wrote:
>> Yes, it ran fine @ 5.2.
>>
>
> From looking at the compiler code, it looks like %ADDR was allowed for
> CONST parms starting in v5r1.
>
It's been years now, but if I recall correctly, the change was to allow
%ADDR() for CONST parameters, but not to allow assigning the result of
that to a variable.
(Assigning the address to a pointer variable could allow someone to
modify the CONST parameter.)
Cheers! Hans
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.