Re: AW: %Addr() on Const parm @v4r5

["M. Lazarus" <mlazarus@xxxxxxxx>]

Birgitta,

 Thanks - it worked like a charm.  Do you know 
what release support for the %Addr(Parm) = *NULL test began for a CONST parm?

 -mark


At 7/13/10 12:41 PM, you wrote:
> >>The CEEDOD API?
>
> Almost ... try API CEETSTA (Test for omitted arguments)
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
>
> Birgitta Hauser
>
> "Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les
> Brown)
> "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)
> "What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training them
> and keeping them!"
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
> Auftrag von M. Lazarus
> Gesendet: Tuesday, 13. July 2010 18:16
> An: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
> Betreff: Re: %Addr() on Const parm @v4r5
>
>   So how would I test for an *OMITted parm?  The CEEDOD API?
>
>
> At 7/13/10 11:52 AM, you wrote:
> >Nope, it's not.
> >
> >On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:07 AM, M. Lazarus <mlazarus@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >  Is this test not allowed under v4r5?  (Note the Const keyword.)
> > >
> > > D  Parm                         10    Const Options( *NoPass: *Omit )
> > > C                  IF         %Addr( Parm  ) = *NULL
> > >
> > >
> > >  -mark