|
I don't often disagree with Dennis but I suspect he may be wrong on
this one.
From what the OP said, the program would read each record and then
run the %scan/regex against the record. That means every record would
have to be surfaced in the program. Using SQL it will only surface
those that match the selection criteria - surely that has to be faster
unless a very high percentage of the records are hits.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.