×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
No, it does not, Steve. I must have missed that need even after reading it twice. Maybe it's my excessive gray hair or dwindling number of gray cells, but I wasn't clear if Robert wanted to have a single program in, say, LPar-A that would execute against data in either/both LPars. Which is why I pointed out that the program object had to exist on both LPars if one used RUNRMTCMD.
Jerry C. Adams
IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
--
B&W Wholesale
office: 615-995-7024
email: jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Where fraternities are not allowed, Communism flourishes. - Barry Goldwater
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of sjl
Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:41 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Calling a remote program...
Jerry -
RUNRMTCMD will allow passing variable values but I don't believe it will
allow the caller to receive the returned values.
- sjl
Jerry wrote:
RUNRMTCMD. From LPar-A one could call a program in LPar-B
(or any system to which one can make a connection).
The program object must exist in LPar-B (in this illustration).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
