My understanding was that the addlible was in the cl program and the
adopted owner authority would come into play
If the addlible was outside of the CL program, then yes you are correct
Alan Shore
Programmer/Analyst, Direct Response
E:AShore@xxxxxxxx
P:(631) 200-5019
C:(631) 880-8640
"If you're going through Hell, keep going" - Winston Churchill
Rory Hewitt
<rory.hewitt@gmai
l.com> To
Sent by: "RPG programming on the IBM i /
rpg400-l-bounces@ System i" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
midrange.com cc
Subject
04/27/2010 03:10 Re: Edit Object Authority for
PM Library, Program, File and User
Security.....
Please respond to
RPG programming
on the IBM i /
System i
<rpg400-l@midrang
e.com>
Alan,
If a user has *EXCLUDE authority to a library, then they can't even add it
to their library list. Personally, I think this is more likely to lead to
problems elsewhere (an ADDLIBLE command in a CL program failing, for
instance). Having *USE authority to the *LIB itself shouldn't be a problem,
as long as the files in the library are suitably controlled,
authority-wise.
That's just me, though.
Rory
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Alan Shore <AlanShore@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lets say the USERS user profile is FREDBLOGGS
The object owners user profile is ONEANDONLY
Then as far as the library authority is concerned
FREDBLOGGS is *EXCLUDE
ONEANDONLY is *USE
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
