×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Albert York wrote:
In my tests, CHECKR performed at least 30% better than %len(%trimr(s))
Definitely something to keep in mind, for cases where I can't simply
calculate the value, based on the lengths of what went into the field.
At any rate, calculating the value, rather than calling %LEN(%TRIMR())
cut processing time per record by about 31 milliseconds out of a total
of about 55 milliseconds. Or in more concrete terms, the time to process
and deliver 5012 records dropped from over 4 1/2 minutes to about 2,
running on a 170.
Thanks to all who had anything to say.
--
JHHL
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
