×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 09:47 -0600, Doug Palme wrote:
I like Scott's idea of using a separate PF for a DS, but they really
cringe about adding additional objects for that purpose. I suppose I
could setup the CL to auto-create the PF, but that seems like more
overhead.
Working in the usual way of having separate libraries for database
objects and programming objects, I have found it useful to put some PFs
in the program library for situations like this. Similarly for files
referenced on OPNQRYF FORMAT(). (What's that I hear from the back row?
Twenty-first century? Nyah, I can't hear you.) Of course, I try hard
to make it obvious that these things may be "files", but they are not
containers for data; lack of a member is one such hint. My program
library also has files which are duplicated at runtime to QTEMP.
Do "they" also object to an arrangement like this?
Cheers,
Terry.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
