× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 13:25 -0430, Luis Rodriguez wrote:

Just curious, Would you care to elaborate on that conversion method?

Well, assume that mm, dd, and yy are pairs of decimal digits and you
have a field with value mmddyy. Multiplication by 10000.01 gives you,
writing it out as what we used to call "long multiplication" ...
ï mmddyy
x 10000.01
-------------
mmddyy0000
mmdd.yy
ï -------------
mmddyymmdd.yy
=============
Truncate product at both ends into a 6-digit field, and you have
yymmdd.

This clever-ugly trick lets you do the conversion in one line. Back on
S/34 and S/36, I often deemed the economy of lines worth the
clever-ugliness. My memory is fading: I cannot remember what method
produced the smallest object code on S/32.

To convert the other direction, use a multiplier of 100.0001. Except,
please, please don't <grin />.

Cheers,
Terry.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.