|
I second Scott's idea.
The other alternative would be to not use XML. Instead, use stored
procedures with regular parameters. Biggest downside to that is
there's no good way to pass for instance an array of detail records.
XML is nice for exchanging data outside your company, or at least with
applications outside your control. But if you control both sides, XML
adds some overhead that's usually not needed. However, since you're
dealing with two platforms and two languages it may be worthwhile.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.