×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
M. Lazarus wrote:
Isn't managing your own signature (almost) the equivalent of doing
LVLCHK(*NO)?
Kind of, yes. Except that there isn't anything similar to using
LVLCHK(*YES).
If you change the export sequence or add/delete one in
the middle, there's no protection from using an version, if you
forget to manually change the signature!
Okay...? Are you saying that hard-coding the signature *without* a
version solves this problem? If so, how?!?!
Or... are you saying that you know of an alternative that would catch
the problem for you if you add/delete one in the middle? If so, please
expand on that.
To read more about my position on the subject, please see the following
article (this is the same article Matt Lavinder posted the link to
earlier in this thread)
http://systeminetwork.com/article/binder-language-and-signature-debate
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
