|
On 16/09/2009, at 7:13 PM, David FOXWELL wrote:
After having read up, I have a couple of questions. If you don't care about space saving, can't you just code the maximum and allocated length as the same?
Yes, but what would be the point? That would effectively be a fixed- length field with an additional 2-byte length prefix. Might make it easier to determine actual length of the content but that's all.
How is space saved? I mean, if the allocated length is 0 and all the rows are in the overflow space, where is this space?
In an internal area associated with the file.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.