|
-----Message d'origine-----
De : rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Charles Wilt
procedures. Also by definition, it's up to the programmer to
not only ensure that any global variables are used correctly,
but to define "correctly" in the first place!
Charles,
What about this kind of scenario :
Procedure P1 in a test program reads File1 and updates a record R1.
Later, another programmer writes P2 that also affects the same record, although that might be a completely unrelated task to that of P1.
The result of the test on procedure P1 might be lost, or worse, it may be assumed to be correct when it is actually the procedure P2 which is inducing the expected result.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.