×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Yes it is smart enough - and has been for many years now. I _think_
it was implemented in RPG/400 but wouldn't swear to it.
Only way to guarantee it is via destruction of the AG or by calling
using a variable and calling a different program and then looping back
and calling the one you want.
Personally I would consider using a flag to indicate when the program
has been replaced and then triggering the re-resolve.
Better still would be to change the process. Seems to me that changing
a program on the fly and then calling it with zero testing is nothing
more than an accident waiting to happen.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On 12-Aug-09, at 2:50 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
If you make FOO a variable, it should re-resolve. But... I wonder if
the compiler is smart enough to know that the if the value being moved
to it is always the same (ex. "MYPGM") it may optimize it out?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
