Re: Pointer vs. BIF performance (was: Getting into pointers)

This question is mostly out of idle curiosity ...

I've got a simple routine that is designed to replace any 5250 control
characters in a RPG source file with blank.

for p = 1 to %len(%trim(SRCDATA));
if %subst(SRCDATA:p:1) < x'40';
%subst(SRCDATA:p:1) = *blank;
endif;
endfor;

Would there be any performance benefit if I used a pointer to update the
field?

D charPtr S *
D char S 1A based(charPtr)

.
.
.

for p = 0 to %len(%trim(SRCDATA));
charPtr = %addr(SRCDATA)+p;
if char < x'40';
char = *blank;
endif;
endfor;

Thanks!

david

--
IBM i on Power - For when you can't afford to be out of business
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing

To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.50/2296 - Release Date: 08/11/09
06:10:00