Re: Call back procedures

[Alan Campin <alan0307d@xxxxxxxxx>]

None that I have seen.

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:05 PM, <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A question has been raised about performance.  Have you noticed any
> performance issues?
>
> It seems to me that it would be just like any other bound procedure call.
>  The target is already in memory.  I would just be making a call based on an
> address.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Alan Campin
> Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 1:02 PM
> To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
> Subject: Re: Call back procedures
>
> I have done a ton of them. Didn't really have any issues. Just like any
> other procedure. It is just being called on the call back instead of through
> the normal methods.
>
>
> Privileged and Confidential.  This e-mail, and any attachments there to, is
> intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain
> privileged or confidential information.  If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify me immediately by a return e-mail and delete this
> e-mail.  You are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this e-mail and/or any attachments thereto, is strictly
> prohibited.
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.