× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2009

Re: Odd CALLPRC behavior when using RPG indicator with RTNVAL

Mark S. Waterbury wrote:
One problem with this, and with the proposed "solution" (to add
"EXTPROC(*CL:name)" to all the RPG procedure prototypes and recompile
ALL callers), is that the previous behavior that David is talking about
was _not_ just some /word-of-mouth/ "_work around_" but it was
*documented* in the _IBM manuals_, as recently as 1999, vis:

Folks:

Just a FYI on this ... we've encountered situations where the 'bug' can return results that APPARENTLY look correct, but are not. Unfortunately, the behavior appears to be completely random.

I haven't heard anything back from IBM yet though ... they have opened a CSP and are discussing it. No answer yet, but discussion is good.

david


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.