Re: FOR loop limit

Chris,

My apologies. I thought we might be on the same page, but then wondered. I should have let it be :-)

Crispin.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Pando" <chris.pando@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "RPG programming on the IBM i / System i" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: FOR loop limit

On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Crispin Bates <cbates@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Chris,

Um, was that addressed at me?

I was agreeing with you. You said:

although I'm not sure I really think it should
have to...

I'm not only not sure it should have to, I am
sure that it should not.

I don't particularly need my compiler to check
for array boundary issues, or memory leaks,
or appropriately sized variables in FOR loops.

Someday, I might *want* to shoot myself
in the foot. I don't want the compiler telling
me that I can't.

Chris
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.