× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. January 2009

Re: FOR loop limit

Hi, Jeff:

IMHO, that looks like an error ("bug") in the compiler generated code -- you should open a PMR with IBM.

What VxRyMz of i5/OS or OS/400 did you encounter this problem at? And what did you specify for TGTRLS? (That could affect it if this problem was already fixed in a subsequent release).

Mark S. Waterbury

> Jeff Crosby wrote:
I learned something new today.

Take the following program:

D x S 3P 0
D y S 3P 0

/free

*INLR = *On;
Y = 999;
For X = 1 To Y By 1;
EndFor;

Return;

/end-free


The program bombs with the dreaded "Message . . . . : The target for a
numeric operation is too small to hold the result (C G D F)."

I guess when the endfor is reached the last time through, it attempts to set
the value of x to 1,000.

Live and learn.

--
Jeff Crosby
UniPro FoodService/Dilgard
P.O. Box 13369
Ft. Wayne, IN 46868-3369
260-422-7531
www.dilgardfoods.com

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my
company. Unless I say so.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.