× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I prefer this "priming" read approach - seems simpler to me, but that's me. I do prefer the single test condition and the cleaner look. I don't do CHAIN, because the first test is a different BIF - %found - IIRC in my cold-befogged mental condition - gotta love Nyquil.

For keyed access I now alter it to

setll file;
reade file;

dow not %eof(file);
process data;
reade file;
enddo;


DennisRootes@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I've always done it this way (proving once again that there are many ways to skin a cat =):

read file;
dow not %eof(file);
process data;
read file;
enddo;


Wow, just back from lunch and so many posts. I consider ITER and LEAVE to
be backwards from the way I think. I condition on what I want to do not on
what I don't want to do.

dou eof;
read file;
if not eof;
processdata;
endif;
enddo;

This makes more sense to me than;

dou eof;
read file;
if eof;
leave;
endif;
processdata;
enddo;

That's my opinion and I'm sticking with it.

Regards,

Guy

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.