|
Rory Hewitt wrote:
> I'd say keep it as separate IF/ENDIF clauses,
with error checking at every stage. *Much* easier to debug and the extra
code is self-documenting. To expand my earlier example:
D AllWorksFine C '1'
D Oops C '0'
if not Control();
dsply 'Control failure!';
exsr error;
endif;
if not Extract();
dsply 'Extract failure!';
exsr error;
endif;
...
Return AllWorksFine;
begsr error;
...error processing...
return Oops;
endsr;
It is less obvious to me that this code does not execute Extract() when
Control() fails than the short-circuit expression version. In the case
above, you need an extra piece of information: the error subroutine
contains a return statement.
I also disagree with Vern that
> Return Control () AND Extract () AND Calculate () AND Output();
is an example of "obfuscatory style". I do however agree that the
compound if structures are more flexible for future maintenance. For
example, suppose the new requirement means adding some special error
handling code that only takes place when Calculate() fails.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.