×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
I came into this conversion a little late and may be missing something here. But if you set indicators 01, 47 & 02, 54. They are the only ones set. It does not set a range.
William
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Barbara Morris
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2008 3:02 PM
To: 'rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: More than 99 indicators needed
Tom Liotta wrote:
I guess that the point I'm making is that _any_ subsequent developer
better be very clear on what is going on with this.
And as Bruce Vining pointed out, it doesn't work anyway. I don't think
there's any way to use 99 indicators to represent any _combination_ of
100 truth values. Using the double-indicator scheme would work if you
only wanted to print out one field, but if you want to print out more
than one, it's not possible to set on an arbitrary combination of the
double-indicators without accidentally setting on additional
double-indicators. Setting the double indicators 0147 and 0254 also
sets on 0154 and 0247.
midrange.com
