Re: More than 99 indicators needed -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

LOL

Probably most of us thought that went without saying!!

Bentley Pearson wrote:

My opinion is this (and I am very surprised that no one has suggested
this already):

MAYBE IT IS TIME TO rebuild this application?!?!?!?!?!?
100 indicators is insane. Just my opinion.
Bentley Pearson Vice President - Information Services Southland National Insurance Corporation 1812 University Blvd Tuscaloosa, Al 35403 205 345 7410 bpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2008 2:08 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: More than 99 indicators needed

On 15-Oct-08, at 12:58 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The OP indicates that a single line of the report could have more than
100 fields, exceeding his ability to control output individually...

It seems to me that perhaps a better (or at least different) way of building the line might be preferable. Why not build it in (say) a DS with overlapping fields where needed. Couldn't be any more confusing than any print line that needs more than 100 indicators!

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.