Re: SQL versus READ for sequential processing -- RPG400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: SQL versus READ for sequential processing
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:48:33 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

David FOXWELL wrote:

Have you an example of enhancements of SQE that cannot be used in this case? I don't think you mean that certain SQL commands wouldn't execute, oder?

That's a good question, David. I'm assuming Birgitta is talking about things like ROLLUP and/or full outer joins. Birgitta, are you saying that some of these won't work with DDS-defined logicals? I don't have a problem with the concept, because I am trying to move entirely to DDL, but it's good to know especially for clients with older legacy systems.

Joe

Follow-Ups:

AW: SQL versus READ for sequential processing , Birgitta Hauser

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.