<my_2_cents>

I might be lazy, but I'd rather use a simple LDA to pass a parm than modify
& test hundreds of programs just because I want to add another parm to 1
program.

</my_2_cents>

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Roger Harman
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:08 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Stuck on accessing the LDA -- manuals no help so far

Sounds like a great campaign slogan. I can't stand programs that pass
'parms' via the LDA. Drives me nuts....


jfranz@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/26/2008 11:38:32 AM >>>
<snip>
pass parms.... kill the lda.
</snip>




----- Original Message -----
From: "James Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 2:31 PM
Subject: Stuck on accessing the LDA -- manuals no help so far


Can somebody point me in the direction of an example of two ILE RPG
programs, neither of which calls the other, communicating with each
other via the Local Data Area?

Preferably without doing an IN on all *DTAARAs known to the program?

When I RTFM on this one, all it does is make me go cross-eyed.

--
James H. H. Lampert
Touchtone Corporation


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].