I always thought it was unnecessary -- simply allow ACTGRP(*DEFAULT) instead of DFTACTGRP(*YES).

Jon Paris wrote:
I think the problem is more that the parameter name DFTACTGRP was always a truly stupid one. If it had been named sensibly it would have been CMPMODE (or whatever Compatibility Mode would become). Seen in that context, the differences make more sense in that the C, C++, and COBOL compilers do not offer compatibility mode operation. You can make a good arguement that COBOL certainly should have offered compatibility mode (and I'll accept my share of the blame for the fact that it doesn't) but there were budgetary constraints at the time that made it impossible to incorporate.


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].