× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Booth Martin wrote:
Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eof vs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?

The latter syntax is specific to the file you're asking about, while the former syntax just returns the values relevant to the last file accessed, which might vary at any given point in the program, if different files were accessed conditionally.

Thus, unless I *really want* the "last file accessed" values, regardless of what the "last file accessed" happened to be, I use the latter syntax.

People talk about wanting to do away with numbered indicators; yet without %found(file) and %eof(file), you'd be stuck with numbered indicators (or awkward syntax involving saved values of %found and %eof) if you needed the results for specific files.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.