×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 10/05/2008, at 5:23 AM, Michael_Schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Yes they are...
No, they're not.
Every year that's divided by 100 that has no remainder is in fact a
leap
year.
Wrong.
Why do you think there was a leap year in 2000 for?
Because it was evenly divisible by 400
There's exactly 25 leap years in a centry...
Nope.
I'm really not following this whole deal about 100 and 400 years...
That's the cause of your misunderstanding.
why not just divide by 4 and check the remainder. If 0 then it's a
leap year.
Because it would give incorrect answers for so-called "century" years.
Unless I'm not unstanding the rules of leap year.
Bingo.
1900 would have been a leap year as was 2000.
1900/4 = 475.0
2000/4 = 500.0
Wrong. 1900 <> leap-year. 2000 == leap_year.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.