|
------------------------------
message: 5
date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:58:11 -0600
from: Jerry Adams <jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Need Some RPG Technical Questions
Luis,
Except when IBM adds a new RPG version (II -> III -> IV),
I have never
seen it remove things from the compilers. So, unless it's
coming out
with RPG V, I really think the cycle we have come to know
and love/hate
will still be there.
There has long been an option (NOMAIN) in the Header
specs to strip out
all of the cycle clutter. Especially useful for service
programs; I've
never tried to use that option for a "regular" program.
Hmmm...wonder if
that would work if one did one's own OPEN's etc.?
* Jerry C. Adams
*IBM System i Programmer/Analyst
B&W Wholesale Distributors, Inc.* *
voice
615.995.7024
fax
615.995.1201
jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Luis Rodriguez wrote:
Cycle, Cycle, Cycle?with
It' doesn't matters, in V6R1 it seems we can do away
the cycle, and hopefully that will be the end of thiskind
of discussions :-).the
On the other hand, the cycle is just another tool in
bag of tricks, and its use or not doesn't make anyone aexperienced,
better or not programmer (or more virtuous, or
or whatever). It all depends on the business problem atsometimes
hand and how you solve it.
(This from a old programmer, that has used (and
still uses) the cycle and looks forward to playing with
cycle-less programs in V6R1).
Regards,
Luis Rodriguez
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.