<snip>
EXTNAME and LIKEREC have exactly the
same functionality except that LIKEREC doesn't allow you to add more
subfields. But that's not really a feature, since if you add more
subfields to the EXTNAME structure, the original subfields still exactly
match the I/O buffer.
</snip>
Plus you can't really call it a "feature" if it allows less functionality
than an alternative, can you. Surely you call it a "limitation"... :-)
So are EXTNAME and LIKEREC basically implemented in the same way under the
covers?
Scott pointed out that doing an explicit read into a LIKEREC DS simply moved
the record buffer, whereas doing an implicit read into an EXTNAME DS did a
field-by-field move, but is that the only difference (under the covers)?
Rory
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This thread ...
RE: Defining datastructure with ExtName/LikeRec, (continued)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.