×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
From: Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:57 PM
As for the disk space, there really isn't much overhead here _IF_ you
turn on system-managed receivers and just tell the OS to delete the
receiver when it's no longer needed.
This is a good point. A lot of my discomfort with CC arises from the vast
amount of work required to support journal receivers back in the bad old
days. There's still management required these days. For example, you might
put your journals in a separate ASP (it's typically a bad setup if one
catastrophic disk failure can take out both your data and your journal).
But anyway, you're right, the general overhead for commitment control is
lower than in days past. It's still not zero, and it's as simply as
flipping a switch, but I would have to say that these days it may be as hard
to justify NOT using commitment control as it is to justify using it.
Joe
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
