|
AGlauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
...Changing from "const" to "value" shouldn't cause any problems in the caller, although it might in the subprocedure itself. ...
It would _definitely_ cause problems in the subprocedure itself. The subprocedure would be trying to get the value of the parameter directly, while the caller would have passed the pointer to the parameter.
Depending on the data type of the parameter, the subprocedure would get a exception due to invalid data (say for packed or date parameters), or it would use nonsense data (say for character or integer parameters).
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
