× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



However, using DBGVIEW(*LIST) (or DBGVIEW(*ALL), for that matter) goes 
against everything that Aaron (like me) is trying to do - to make his 
production objects (which he ships to *external* customers) more secure.

No argument - but in order to debug when you use *SOURCE you have to put the 
source on the target machine.  I would argue that that is even less secure.  
The scenario I would propose is to:

a) Compile with *LIST
b) Produce copy of *PGM for distribution
c) Remove debug capability completely from the copy
d) Ship the copy
e) In the event that I need to debug on the production system copy the debug-
able version to the system.
f) When debugging complete reinstate the no-debug version or (simpler) 
remove the debug capability from the production copy.

Surely this is safer than having a source on the production box?  The only 
potential exposure of my code is during the period when I'm actively 
debugging and someone would have to know how to resurrect a source from the 
debug-able version of the program.


Jon Paris
Partner400
www.Partner400.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.