RE: ISTKT & DYNSQL vs. 5722ST1 SQL Development Kit -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: ISTKT & DYNSQL vs. 5722ST1 SQL Development Kit
From: "Alan Campin" <Alan.Campin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:02:07 -0700
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Our iSeries shop is small, with an even smaller software budget so
purchasing the IBM SQL precompiler (5722ST1) simply isn't going to

happen.

OK, am I confused.

I remember reading that the SQL complier was now standard with OS/400
like all the language compliers.

Did IBM decide to not do that?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: ISTKT & DYNSQL vs. 5722ST1 SQL Development Kit , Wilt, Charles

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.